Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
Yeah, the fact that he's held public office and has a conservative voting history had nothing whatsoever to do with people choosing him over the other two. It was all Democrat strategery that got him the win. Good luck with that ploy.

$1.5 million that the Dems spent to boost Akin was more than his entire underdog campaign. His conservative bona fides are flawless, but facts are facts.

335 posted on 08/25/2012 5:01:05 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: montag813
$1.5 million that the Dems spent to boost Akin was more than his entire underdog campaign.
Whoop-te-do! So what!?

How is he supposed to control what the Dems do?
He couldn't stop Dems from cross party voting in an open primary could he?

And what do you honestly think would have happened if he had asked or told McCaskill to stop funding such ads?

353 posted on 08/25/2012 5:42:42 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson