Good job of picking out a small portion of my response. I was all over Lott at the time including calling his office, sending email, and sending faxes. I sent him information about Juanita. She would have been there. I was all over D’Amato’s office to them to call the troopers to contradict nanny Helen Dickey’s Vince Foster death perjury before their committee.
In addition to criticizing Lott, I mentioned that the game was rigged and the RATS would never throw out Clinton. I had Dave Schippers on my show two or three times and had several conversations with him. That is how he saw it — it was rigged. Never will I defend Lott. I wanted him out of there and railed against him on talk radio.
So I see your response as a mischaracterization of my position and the actions I have taken. Your moral of the story was irrelevant to my post.
“Good job of picking out a small portion of my response. I was all over Lott at the time including calling his office, sending email, and sending faxes.”
Then your actions today are illogical. Once again how can you defend Akin due solely to the argument that “well he has an ‘R’ next to his name” but then relive the days when you were rightfully attacking the faux Republican Trent Lott?? You don’t see the inconsistency there?