Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer
I agree with you, but as a practical matter, you will never get what you want as literally millions of babies are destroyed. If we limited it to just rape ,incest,and the LIFE of the mother we could pass that tomorrow. This has gone way to far to end up as an intellectual exercise as opposed as a way to save millions of babies. We can talk about the issue for another 60 years or we can pass a law that a majority could get behind and limit the destruction to a few thousands as opposed to millions.

It is our absolutism that has kept the argument going for 60 years. If we could save 99%, why not start there?

43 posted on 08/25/2012 12:27:18 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: chuckles

Such a law not could NOT be passed and signed by The Disaster but it would entail such an intrusive state that few here would even support it.


47 posted on 08/25/2012 6:51:36 AM PDT by arrogantsob (Obama MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson