Pro cycling is the dirtiest sport and everyone knows it. You accuse others others of malfeasance yet bend yourself into a pretzel defending the slimeball.
Nice emotional response to a logical argument.
Perhaps you would consent to answering a simple question...
What evidence that is admissible within the bicycling sports world has USADA presented that shows he is guilty?
Forget, if you can, your prior decision that he IS guilty.
I haven’t defended anyone. I have simply identified that USADA ignores the rules in order to pursue Armstrong. If that is your preferred method of “justice”, then perhaps you may be on the wrong forum?
BTW - if Pro Cycling is the “dirtiest sport”, why are you advocating that the second most successful “cheater” (using your conclusion) be rewarded, when the most successful “cheater” never got caught? Envy? LOL
You two n00b trolls need to get a room.
Motel 5-1/2 is probably just down the street from you.
Take the hint.