N.H. sheriff candidate apologizes for saying he could use deadly force to stop a mass murderer, which is exactly what the bloody-handed abortuary butcher is.
...and my point here is, wether or not you agree with laws, you don’t get to be judge jury and executioner, which apparently this nutjob wants to be...he should be run out of the state.
Don’t like abortion? work to change the laws - threatening to kill people who do legally protected things because you don’t happen to agree with them makes you a terrorist, not a sheriff.
The stupid appears to be contagious. Bells can not be unrung dummys.
Another democrat maybe?
Just heard the story of a lesbian attacking herself so she could justify liberal causes.
“Just because a person is not born yet doesn’t mean he or she shouldn’t have same level of protection. Someone needs to stand up and tell federal and state officials they’re wrong if it’s in the best interest of citizens ... but my main point is deadly force is always a last resort.”
No apology needed for standing up for Life.
No illegal stopping of legal murder.
What a screwd-up society we live in.
Notice how every single news article, newscast and DNC communication related to these clowns starts with the word “Republican”.
Since it happened, the ‘rats have been repeating that “rape” comment nonstop in their communications to make sure all their shock troops repeat it to swing voters.
It also sickens me to see so many FReepers taking the bait. For the record, I abhor abortion. However, like substance abuse, it will not be stopped and the situation will only be made worse by violence, outlawing or restricting the act itself. We need to focus on improving and educating society so fewer people see abortion as an option. Only then will it naturally go away.
This looks pretty loony for a sheriff to say this of course. But it made me think about something. The fetal personhood definition has been tried in several states, and I don’t think it’s passed anywhere, and I assume most states just don’t have a definition of when protection of the law applies in regards to babies in utero. So is there any reason a county or city can’t pass a law defining a fetus as a person? It would certainly be easier to find a simple majority in a conservative county rather than find enough state legislators willing to take a bold step. Not sure it’s what the prolife cause needs, but I can’t think of any laws it contradicts.