Have to disagree with that. Sorry. I see government *data*.
The science begins when humans interpret that data. I did government science for a while. It’s VERY political. VERY. And no matter how big the budget it’s NEVER enough.
If government science was uniformly accurate we’d all be dead from swine flu. After having most of us drowned from global warming related flooding.
Government ‘science’ has resulted in most rural weather stations being removed from the temperature calculations used to determine ‘warming’. Those located at airports and areas that have increasingly become suburban in the past 30 year? *Those* data points are golden, you understand. No agenda. None. Don’t you dare even think those heretical thoughts!
www.wattsupwiththat.com is a great site for discussions involving government weather ‘science’ and government data alike.
I meant that each time we follow a storm we see the government (NOAA in this case) feed us their data and tell us what it means (government science)
Yet if you follow any thread you see quickly during a storm that their dogmatic dictum is discarded within hours
.
bttt