Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
I see this as similar to the reaction of the Establishment to the Mourdock defeat of Lugar in the primary.

Oh come on! That is an insult to Mourdock and your fellow FReepers who only want to unseat McCasKILL. ALL FReepers cheered Mourdock's win!

This is ALL Akin's doing, not some GOPe vendetta. That's just intellectually dishonest. It is easy to see how he will lose this CRITICAL Senate seat and allow one of the worst anti-LIFE Senators another SIX years!

It is so telling when your extreme liberal opponent (McCaskill) wants you (Akin) to stay in the race (Missouri update) and invested money in your primary win!

137 posted on 08/22/2012 9:02:17 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross
Oh come on! That is an insult to Mourdock and your fellow FReepers who only want to unseat McCasKILL. ALL FReepers cheered Mourdock's win!

I was not talking about FReeper reaction to Mourdock, but rather, the GOP Establishment. I made that quite clear. Lugar was a dead lock on reelection. No doubt about it. Mourdock is not.

I have no idea what FReeper reaction was when Akin got the nomination. I know that some supported Steeleman because of the Palin endorsement.

This is ALL Akin's doing, not some GOPe vendetta. That's just intellectually dishonest. It is easy to see how he will lose this CRITICAL Senate seat and allow one of the worst anti-LIFE Senators another SIX years!

The GOP piled on immediately. They wanted him out, apology or not. One verbal gaffe and he was toast as far as they were concerned. Priebus and Cornyn indicated they were cutting off funding if he remained in the race.

The people of Missouri will decide whether they want McCaskill (Obamacare, deficits, national debt, failed stimulus, an out of control EPA, unemployment) versus Akin(good on the issues affecting real people in real life but committed one verbal gaffe.) If the people of Missouri cannot sort this out, then I have no sympathy for them. We deserve to lose if we can't make this case to the people.

McCaskill wants Akin because he is the most conservative candidate. This was before the verbal gaffe. The voters will have a clear choice. McCaskill should be careful for what she wished for. America loves the underdog. Hopefully, Missouri will too. It is in their own interests to vote for Akin. McCaskill's policies versus Akin's verbal gaffe. What has more impact on their lives?

139 posted on 08/22/2012 9:19:47 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross
Is this ad by McCaskill meant to help Akin? This is pure insanity if you think it does. She did similar ads about Brunner and Steelman.
140 posted on 08/22/2012 9:27:40 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson