Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin goes nuclear, says Todd Akin chose himself over the country (Audio)
The Right Scoop ^ | 08/21/2012 | Staff

Posted on 08/21/2012 5:38:35 PM PDT by nhwingut

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-174 next last
To: Red Steel
I suggest the rambling old fool whose campaign received millions from Claire get a grip and leave.
This man is a dangerous fool and a liar .
Using a slanted poll as the reason to stay in is pure BS.
He is a power hungry DC egomaniac.
81 posted on 08/21/2012 6:53:04 PM PDT by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Akin is definitely not a rutabaga!


82 posted on 08/21/2012 6:53:12 PM PDT by Rutabega (No one reads these anyway, right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels

Which is one valid way that the body will reject a pregnancy and have a spontaneous abortion, but the point is “will reject a pregnancy” in other words, an already existing pregnancy.

What Akin was referring to clearly, especially after his interview with Hannity was Willke’s goofy idea about the reproductive system not allowing full fertilization to occur through stress and other factors.

Even in the first example, preeclampsia is still pretty rare(less than 10% of all pregnancies) and couples who are trying to conceive are being told that the more a woman is exposed to the man’s sperm, the less likely the odds of it occurring are.


83 posted on 08/21/2012 6:53:26 PM PDT by PhxTM06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Absolutely but that does not negate what the author wrote here:

"In saying that women "shut down" pregnancy after rape, Rep. Akin unwittingly stumbled upon the concept that women's bodies reject unfamiliar sperm."

Read the article and Ask her.

84 posted on 08/21/2012 6:54:03 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rutabega

RUTABAGA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)


85 posted on 08/21/2012 6:54:13 PM PDT by PhxTM06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I honestly don’t think it would help. This is not his first verbal gaff. It won’t be his last.


86 posted on 08/21/2012 6:54:38 PM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Rutabega

LOL...my apologies to Rutabagas everywhere.


87 posted on 08/21/2012 6:55:32 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Yeah....20-30 weeks after pregnancy and affecting less than 10% of all pregnancies... once again, you’re reading something without understanding what you’re reading.

Not to mention that it’s absolutely clear that was not what Akin was referring to anyways.


88 posted on 08/21/2012 6:55:42 PM PDT by PhxTM06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PhxTM06

“Rapists subsconsciously target victims based on their likelihood of conception.”

So there is no conclusion on the biological factors which may prevent pregnancy during rape, yet medicine has reached the conclusion that rapists subconciously choose to rape women who unknown to them are likely to conceive? How can they be so sure about one and not other.


89 posted on 08/21/2012 6:55:45 PM PDT by Windy City Conservative (Kyle Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PlateOfShrimp

Elmer Gantry and Norm Crosby......what a pair!


90 posted on 08/21/2012 6:56:17 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

You are a coward too. You can’t face the consequences of not providing an abortion exception for rape so you pretend rape pregnancy never happens.

It does. You believe a pathetic myth.


91 posted on 08/21/2012 6:56:53 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

The Declaration was just a manifesto, with NO legal force.

The Constitution is the ruling document of the land...or at least its supposed to be.


92 posted on 08/21/2012 6:57:52 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman; Uncle Slayton
"Aiken is a city in South Carolina ... Todd Akin, on the other hand, is a self important fool.L

LOL. Stuart Varney just said on Hannity's TV program that Aiken needs to step aside NOW.

93 posted on 08/21/2012 6:58:52 PM PDT by Miss Behave (All ways, always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Is Akin less of a retard than McCaskill or not?

That's all that matters.

94 posted on 08/21/2012 6:59:34 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Akin meant rape rape

AH! Sometimes I miss the subtle nuance...

95 posted on 08/21/2012 6:59:52 PM PDT by Antoninus II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels
This is not his first verbal gaff. It won’t be his last.

Missouri is the SHOW ME state -- not the Tell ME state.

Actions in Missouri speak louder than words.

96 posted on 08/21/2012 7:00:41 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Also there is an Aitkin Minnesota, pronounced the same way.


97 posted on 08/21/2012 7:00:57 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels

Then he should be advised to just keep quiet except for attacking McCaskill.


98 posted on 08/21/2012 7:02:21 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Since she was bright enough to see that he would implode and thus backed him financially in the primary, the answer seems to be no.

I’m just amazed that the guy was getting all this backing, almost $2 million dollars worth from Democrats, and nobody stopped to go “hmmmm, maybe supporting this guy isn’t such a good idea.”


99 posted on 08/21/2012 7:03:05 PM PDT by PhxTM06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Akin is not going anywhere so that “rambling old fool” has the opportunity to make the Dem half-wits wallow in their “poor investment” culminating in their defeat.


100 posted on 08/21/2012 7:03:27 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson