Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plummz

I’ll give you gibberish!

Gibberish is when Joel Gilbert maintains he obtained the images of the model from amongst the belongings of Frank Marshall Davis.

WHEN THEY ORIGINATED FROM THE FREE-VINTAGE-PORN WEBSITE. In a section of many pages of girls posing in stockings, high heeled shoes and fancy earrings.

And what you have from the University of Hawaii is nothing but a letter with AN ENROLLMENT DATE. FALL, 1960.

You have no record of attendance and no transcript. She may have enrolled, but you have nothing to show she attended.

Now, considering that you are convinced I am crazy, how about letting me get on with it, ignore me? I mean, you’re so smart, why would you want to waste your time with a crazy person?


89 posted on 08/23/2012 9:30:05 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks; little jeremiah; Brown Deer
Gibberish is when Joel Gilbert maintains he obtained the images of the model from amongst the belongings of Frank Marshall Davis.

WHEN THEY ORIGINATED FROM THE FREE-VINTAGE-PORN WEBSITE. In a section of many pages of girls posing in stockings, high heeled shoes and fancy earrings.

Joel Gilbert apparently presents the living Elvis Presley and the Frank Marshall Davis theory in separate compartments.

So in the case of Elvis Presley he doesn't mean it, but in the case of Frank Marshall Davis he does mean it and bases it on photos of a woman who is not Stanley Ann Dunham--on top of Stanley Ann Dunham not being DBA OBAMA's mother.

The woman from the pornographic poses cannot be Stanley Ann Dunham.

The model's ears are nothing like Stanley Ann Dunham's; the former are close, the latter elephantine.

The model's features do not align with those of Stanley Ann Dunham.

The model's nose lacks the characteristic asymmetry of Stanley Ann Dunham.

So the photos were widely distributed, not privately held by Frank Marshall Davis.

The woman posing is not Stanley Ann Dunham.

There was a role for Stanley Ann Dunham: that of nanny, not mother.

There was a role for Communist Frank Marshall Davis: that of ideological indoctrinator, not father.

Joel Gilbert is like the King of Nepal as described by Miriam F., the career Foreign Service officer who told me, "He tells you a beautiful story, but it isn't the truth."

Joel Gilbert doesn't really mean Elvis is Alive and Paul is Dead, but he really, really means Frank Marshall Davis is really DBA OBAMA's father.

No, really.


93 posted on 08/24/2012 1:54:22 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Fakistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks
Gibberish is when Joel Gilbert maintains he obtained the images of the model from amongst the belongings of Frank Marshall Davis.

This is a false statement. Gilbert never claimed any such thing. You have been corrected on this matter before. It is possible that you originally made this mistake due to your extremely poor grasp of the English language. (Which also contributes to your gibberish issue.) When you repeat this false staement, it raises suspicion that you are intentionally lying. You should stop repeating this lie -- it is rude and it is trolling. WHEN THEY ORIGINATED FROM THE FREE-VINTAGE-PORN WEBSITE.

No need to scream like a crazy person. You're still wrong. The snaps originated from Frank Marshall Davis, who took the nude pics of Ann Dunham in his home and sold them to photo agencies. Decades later, some landed on that website. More contemporarily, the photos were sold to pin-up and porno mags, which Gilbert tracked down on eBay.

what you have from the University of Hawaii is nothing but a letter with AN ENROLLMENT DATE. FALL, 1960.

Yes, we do have that official document. You have nothing to substantiate your claim to the contrary. You need not scream like a crazy person. it doesn't make your BS more true.

Your above statement that there is "nothing but," is actually a lie, because, as you know, we also have the U Washington transcript indicating the UHawaii classes she received credit for when she transferred to UWashington.

You have no record of attendance and no transcript. She may have enrolled, but you have nothing to show she attended.

More lies, as indicated above.

why would you want to waste your time with a crazy person?

I'm just trying to help out the folks reading this thread who may be confused by your lies and crazed rantings. If you'd stop trolling and lying, I wouldn't need to correct you.

106 posted on 08/24/2012 10:54:25 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson