Just more recycling material from the Washington Compost.
“But there is a widespread view in both parties that it is feasible and desirable that in the future the federal government should be no larger as a share of the overall economy than it has been historically.”
lol....Whatever, Larry. You, idiot.
lololol
It’s hard, so don’t try.
It is like an addict trying to get off crack. It will be difficult to reduce federal spending because we have developed a culture of dependency. As Reagan said, “Government is the problem, not the solution.”
We'll see which “reality” becomes real sooner rather than later.
Say what?
” Since the early 1980s the price of hospital care and higher education has risen fivefold relative to the price of cars and clothing, and more than a hundredfold relative to the price of televisions.”
And why the five fold increase? I’m sure glad the government is NOT producing TVs.
The bipartisan socialist bosses can do whatever they want with the increasing pile of debt, but they won’t continue to have big government without enough sustainable revenues from an adequate manufacturing base. The remainder of the default process will lead us to much smaller government, whether they want it or not. That’s why they’ve become hysterical and are predicting all kinds of ends to our world, trying to panic and threaten the populace into rioting, etc. They’re morally bankrupt and are losing all that they have. After the repudiation, “haircuts,” deep cuts in government incomes, etc., we’ll begin to see new and better leaders who are more technical capable and analytical in their thinking.