So the discussion of race and religion is what America needs just now? I’m not voting for Pope and I’m not waxing nostalgic for the bad old days. We have something to get done
As soon as you teach water to run uphill, let the NYT and the media know you disapprove of their stance.
This article is all over the internet because it is in the NYT, and there will be more.
The MittBots on FR must believe that if they don't see it, it ain't happening so they howl because they are faced with the facts of his mormonism.
As soon as Mitt distances himself from mormon doctrine and practices, I will try to be the first to bring the news to FR.
That was not my question, my question was: what in the article is incorrect?
If you don’t know, perhaps you should learn about Mormonism before you defend it or pretend it will not matter after the convention.
[So the discussion of race and religion is what America needs just now?]
Well see, the American Founders thought so much of the discussion of religion that they included the prohibition against state establishments thereof (like the fraudulent farce in the territory of Deseret) in no less than the FIRST amendment - lest folks end up on the short end of the “COMMERCE BETWEEN MASTER AND SLAVE IS DESPOTISM” stick, again.
It’s understandable that those on The Ladder might find that objectionable. Boo hoo for them.