You've got that right. And one of the cards we have to play is PLURALITY. The last time a liberal was elected president on a plurality, conservatives impeached him; the time before that, they bulldozed him with the Republican Revolution. Pluralities favor conservatives.
Getting rid of "Nobama" is a flawed priority if you are only able to replace him with a Republican who advances all the same things Democrats do, and ROMNEY DOES. To describe Romney as simply "not meeting all criteria" is duplicitous -- in fact and in deed, Romney has ADVANCED every single major liberal agenda. Newt or Cain or Santorum would have required compromise on the part of conservatives; Romney requires absolute surrender. LOOK AT THE MAN'S RECORD.
We CAN and WOULD survive another four years of Obama, especially if he was elected on a plurality -- if he was as powerful as the GOP wants you to believe (fear of Obama is their only argument for voting for a liberal like Romney), then we wouldn't be having this conversation nor elections in 2012.
Vote for a plurality. That's the best hand we've got.
A-men. There are worse things than 4 years of Obama. Capitulating to the gay agenda by electing Romney would be an even greater disaster.
I beg to disagree with you. We will NOT survive another 4 years of obama in office. We must get rid of this regime and hold Mitt’s feet to the fire if elected.
Deep down, I think Mitt wants to be a good president and he isn’t so stupid as to know that his policies will be in the history books. However, one cannot say that about the current occupant of the WH. He’s truly ignorant of economics. His positions are far more harmful to America, than Mitts.
Mitt needs an ephiphany - a come to Jesus moment on this issue.
I beg to disagree with you. We will NOT survive another 4 years of obama in office. We must get rid of this regime and hold Mitt’s feet to the fire if elected.
Deep down, I think Mitt wants to be a good president and he isn’t so stupid as to know that his policies will be in the history books. However, one cannot say that about the current occupant of the WH. He’s truly ignorant of economics. His positions are far more harmful to America, than Mitts.
Mitt needs an epiphany - a come to Jesus moment on this issue.