Your level of BS and dishonesty and distortion and anti-Reaganism, and anti-conservatism, is high.
Reagan-*””did evolve to be solidly pro-life. Despite his (then) scandalously liberal personal life as a divorcee (Jane Wyman)””
You lied to smear Reagan, Reagan was always pro-life and never known for a scandalous personal life.
Reagan-*””Thank goodness that conservatives supported him despite his Libertarian social leanings “”
You keep lying, Reagan was the first pro-life and social conservative presidential hero of the social conservatives. If you want social libertarian go with HW Bush, or Carter, or Ford, or Clinton, etc. not the hero of the religious right.
*””I think that the points that you make about Romney aligning himself with mainstream Rockerfeller/Country Club Republicans, or cozying up with the ruling Democrat power brokers while he was in business at Bain Capital in Boston are consistent with a pragmatist who is working with the existing power structures, or positioning himself to get elected in Massachusetts. (such as registering as an independent, and voting for the local candidate from Mass, Paul Tsongas in the Democrat primary, but not in the general election). Any responsible executive has an obligation to manage a favorable relationship with the political powerbrokers - it is common to contribute to both sides like Trump does.””
Wow, lots of lying, I never said that stuff, or anything close to it, because that is a fake description that you made up of Romney’s political past.
*””The rumor I heard on abortion is that a Romney family member died from an illegal abortion, but that is just an unsourced rumor.””
I don’t know whether you are lying here, or just don’t know much about Mitt Romney, I think that you just don’t know much about Romney.
*”” His ACU rating of 88% while Govenor shows that he was not the unmitigated liberal that he is painted as by some on this forum.””
Come on guy... The ACU doesn’t rate governors.
*””He was considered by many in the Republican establishment as too conservative for the 2008 nomination.””
We missed that at freerepublic, care to share with us?
Here is where Human Events reports Romney’s ACU rating of 88.98 over 9.45 years of service (they do rate Presidential nominees - try Google before you try slander and libel). http://www.humanevents.com/2012/01/05/romney-picks-up-most-congressional-endorsements-to-date/
Not as high as Paul Ryan’s 91.69, but better than Hussein’s 10%...
I have grown tired of you calling me a liar - it’s like having to deal with democrat.
Let me try again with small words and short sentences:
1.Reagan is good.
2.Even Reagan can seem bad, if you only talk about his bad points.
3. If you only look at bad points, and judge everything and anyhing by them, you will miss the good.
4. If you see only the bad points of someone, you can be so confused, as to think that Romney is as bad as Obama.
If you think clearly, and you care for this country, you will conclude that a better President is better than a worse President, and you would be able to see that Romney is better than Obama.