Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12; All
That doesn’t describe Mitt Romney at all, Romney knows exactly who he is, and has passionately advanced his politics, with money, fund raising, campaigning, governing, and he has been bold in his speaking for, and advancing liberalism, and now he is the presidential nominee of the republican party.

Romney set out 5 years ago to create the myth that Reagan was pro-choice, he has spread it on TV, radio, in interviews , calling Reagan “adamantly pro-choice”.

Romney despises Reagan, Reagan ran against his father in the presidential primary of 1968. Mitt Romney renounced his republican party membership in 1979, because of Reagan winning the nomination.

After leaving the party because of Reagan, Romney became a supporter of liberal republicans through the 1980s, until 1989, after that, all of Romney’s donations went to democrats, Romney even did democrat fundraising and voted democrat, and then in October of 1993, after Reagan was gone, and Bush defeated for reelection, Romney rejoined the GOP.

In 1994, Mitt was giving to, and fund raising for Planned Parenthood and campaigning on having been anti-Reagan during the Reagan years.

When 2005/6 came, and it was time to take over the GOP at the national level, he did almost an entire reversal of all of his public politics and beliefs, did it work? Read your posts, look at who the nominee is, it worked.


So how do you reconcile the decision of the lady that Michael Reagan referred to as (paraphrased) "Dad's back, and he's in a dress", i.e., Sarah Palin who has pledged to support and vote for the Romney-Ryan ticket? She has apparently recognized that the only vehicle for getting 0bama out of the White House is the GOP ticket this year, so is Sarah a sage, or a sell out?

Do tell us your views on that.
197 posted on 08/18/2012 5:48:36 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in America's panties, 0bama is the yellow stain in front!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup
" ...so is Sarah a sage, or a sell out? OK, You asked. She didn't want it, so she picked the only one, besides herself, who can beat the incumbent.
198 posted on 08/18/2012 5:58:52 AM PDT by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

Views on what?

If you ever thought that the republican leader, and the vice presidential candidate for 2008, would not be endorsing the 2012 republican ticket, then that is something I don’t understand.


225 posted on 08/18/2012 7:38:55 AM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson