[<1/1,000,000th%]

More gibberish from the science haters.

What was really reported was that the ratio of U238 to U235 differed by half a percentage point more than was commonly believed.

That means instead of a rock formation being a billion years old, it’s 995 million years old.

[metmom]

What was really reported was that the ratio of U238 to U235 differed by half a percentage point more than was commonly believed.

That means instead of a rock formation being a billion years old, it’s 995 million years old.

What it means is that science is not reliable. Either it cannot be trusted because it is not accurate, it is being constantly *revised* as new data comes in.

Or the decay rates actually are changing thus the premise on which science is built cannot be trusted and all the conclusions built on that are wrong.

Evolutionists who live in glass houses should not throw stones.