You may be correct about logical fallacies contained in the referenced article.
But that, in and of itself, doesn’t logically mean that the conclusions are incorrect.
In addition, try to set aside the “faith” behind any argument and simple consider the evidence as a skeptical scientist. Ask a lot of questions, and question ever assumption.
When I say set aside faith, I mean the faith in Darwinism as well.
There are so many problems that it has become unworkable.
Best of luck to you.
But that, in and of itself, doesn’t logically mean that the conclusions are incorrect.
No, it does not. I have no problem with the proposition that the conclusions may be true. I do have a problem with the proposition that it must be true, and this proves it. It's implied that the decay rate of Uranium can be accelereated to 4 million times normal by heating it to magma temperatures. If that works you should be able to make an atom bomb with a chunk of Uranium and a blast furnace.