Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga

I have a hard time believing PBT-types are more populous (.033) than Rottweilers (.003??? serious?) and spitz-types (.02). Even though it is a type covering many breeds and not just 1.

You might need adjustment to that. Of course, having PBTs and Presas up there in the list in not shocking, even if they don’t make #1.


102 posted on 08/19/2012 9:22:28 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel
You might need adjustment to that

The stats came from www.dogsbite.org. I'm not going to challenge them because I don't know. I do know that the CDC keeps bite statistics, but doesn't make any representation as to the numbers of breeds in the pet population. If you can find the stats for breed distribution in the population of US pets you can merge it with the CDC data and voila you can work out your own table. This is getting too much like work for me to want to do that.

105 posted on 08/20/2012 4:42:54 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson