[Phlyer]

To use your metaphor, it's more like coke or cyanide. Romney is bad, but if you can't see that Obama is even worse, then you're closing your eyes, putting your fingers in your ears, and going LALALALLALA.

I don't like Romney. He's not a conservative. But Obama is far, far worse.

And hoping for a 'plurality' is saying that it's worse for Romney to win with a majority he can claim as a mandate than for Obama to win with only a plurality.

Nothing is worse than an Obama win.

I'm not a Republican and I will not again give a dime to the Republican party until they embrace true Constitutionalist principles. A sign of that would be to nominate an honest conservative instead of someone who would indeed have worn a D label in the party of Kennedy, Humphrey, and even Truman. You don't have to convince me that Romney is bad. I know that.

But *nothing* is worse than an Obama win.

You'd rather have Obama than Romney, if your vote would be the one that allowed Romney to win. That's your choice. We disagree.

[Kevmo]

To use your metaphor, it’s more like coke or cyanide.
***That’s not using his metaphor, it’s changing it dramatically. To use your metaphor (the way you used his) it’s more like cyanide or arsenic. Arguing that the taste of bitter almonds is better for the country is ridiculous.