Posted on 08/11/2012 4:42:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Except for his unfortunate go along to get along support of TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending and the increased credit limit, etc, Ryan is a pretty good choice. Probably the best choice of the RINOS that were on Romney's short list. I support Ryan for the vice presidency. Wish he were at the top of the ticket, though.
But I still cannot and will not support the grand father of ObamaCare. Romney still loves and brags about his bastard brainchild, RomneyCare, even today when he knows what an anti-liberty socialist POS it is.
And the fact that he advocated that abortion should be safe and legal in America for over three decades of his adult lifetime and even advocated that Roe v Wade should be supported and sustained as settled law precludes any consideration whatsoever by this pro-life Christian for Myth Romney for the presidency.
And the fact that he boasted that he would be better for "gay rights" than Ted Kennedy, and proved it just increases my resistance.
That, and his penchant for gun control, his continuing support for global warming, gays in the scouts, gays in the military, and his record of appointing liberal judges makes it all but impossible for me to support him.
Lastly, we're having a bit of changeover on our moderator staff. At least two moderators resigned this afternoon after I flatly refused to rein in a so-called anti-Mormon "bigot" on FR. Well, if being in opposition to false prophets and false prophecy makes a Christian believer a bigot, then I guess I'm a bigot. I've posted before that I flat do not believe that the Book of Mormon is the true word of God. Nor do I believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. The Christian bible warns us to be weary of false prophets and that I am. Romney being the presumptive Republican nominee does not change that fact.
Go ahead and ride that razor, chumlee. Don’t whine when you get cut.
Point out to the posters how you are fully backing those who do. And BTW, YOU said what you said TWICE. No error there.
Bigot.
Cry baby
Mormons are nice people, but that doesn’t change the fact the the book of Mormon is fiction not the Word of God and Joseph Smith was not a prophet of God.
I’m fully backing those who do what, Norm?
I’ll say whatever I wish, repeatedly.
But more importantly, I won’t back or help elect a Marxist to the White House.
Those who do are the liberals/commies/socialists.
...a liberal!
Yup. ;) One of 'em was hyperventilating, earlier, that I'd been "demonizing people in battleground states for getting the Marxist out"... but, after being immediately and publicly asked (TWICE!!!) to point to any examples of same: Zero. Zip. Nada. Bupkis. The Big Goose Egg.
Oh. The shock. My heart. ;)
You support that vile BS? Perhaps if took your head out of your Romney supporting tail you’d understand that that statement was wholly uncalled for and that idiot deserves the zot.
But I expect a person who abandons one principle to abandon the rest as easily. To think you once had some...
I’d be more than happy to administer it.
Let’s see a sample of your intended opus as the first test.
I SAID when I reached the end of the thread! I reached it. Screenshot, out of here. I am assuming that you are going to kick in the donations that all these people you drive off are taking with them, is that right?
ROTFLMAO!!!!! Post away, 2008! I'll happily match my ten-year rep on this site (and with its owner) against yours, whenever you think you've managed to scrounge up the requisite amount of sack!
Jim: PINGing you, because I absolutely insist you see this little yip-yop's proof of my devious liberal perfidy. ;)
********************
Show your cards, wimp.
“I’ll say whatever I wish, repeatedly.”
Spoken like a determined bigot defending his twice-stated bigotry. Now any other mockery of the faith you’d like to repeat repeatedly?
Bye!!!!!!
BTW, Stop the TBL money threats.
Aw, you’re just hurting my feelings calling me a bigot, so many times.
So, if and when you decide to vote for yourself for president, what are the odds that you’ll be improving the conditions for the country?
lmao
I don’t think that’s the correct solution. I think it’s the RINO solution
***Yes, and we are a far cry from discussing the overblown fear that the “country will not survive four more years”.
To: kevao
And for those of us in toss-up states who do not believe the country will survive four more years of Obama, to vote for anyone other than Romney would not be rational.
***Your “belief that the country won’t survive” is what is not rational. Proceeding from that irrational belief is cowardice.
2,169 posted on Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:20:09 PM by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It’s A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2098 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Another flip flop?
What now has The Great Deceiver convinced the easily deceived on?
Maybe if you ‘put some blood over your door’ I’ll vote for a lib like you.... (note the sarcasm)
The blood covering is there for me, every single day, Norm.
But I really was wondering what improvements the country can thank you for after you’ve voted for....yourself for president.
I mean realistically, not the stuff that fantasies are made of.
You are free to do a search, dear.
***You posted the claim, so provide the links. I think your claim is bogus.
Then why do you so cavalierly throw passover around like a cheap points tool for debate?
What I would do as president is stick to the constitution. Simple. Can Romney say the same? HAS HE??? If not why vote for that which you truly oppose, expecting to get what you want?
Logical fallacy.
You insult people with comments like that!
***Just CINOs, for the most part. Have you converted any 0bots to mittbots today? or are you still focusing on sowing discord among conservatives?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.