[Diogenesis]

Conservatives do not need a “bridge”.

We need a real conservative as POTUS.

A “bridge” means two things.
First, Mr. RomneyCARE is in the wrong party.
Second, he will defer to the DNC on his next act.

[DManA]

Good point. Why would he need a bridge unless he’s on the other side of the river from us?

[cripplecreek]

Lord Mittless will get a small bump but then he’ll speak and it will evaporate and his surrogates will blame Ryan for hurting the master.

[TexasCajun]

Tough crowd.

[VanDeKoik]

“Conservatives do not need a “bridge”.

We need a real conservative as POTUS.

A “bridge” means two things.
First, Mr. RomneyCARE is in the wrong party.
Second, he will defer to the DNC on his next act.”

Ok, sure. Dont vote for them, and enjoy Obama for 4 more years.

Little tip: Posting satiric jpegs against him wont save you from what he has planned.

[TADSLOS]

The problem with bridges to conservatism is that republicans have a nasty habit of burning them once in power until they get their teeth kicked in by the liberal left that they cozy up to in the name of bi-partisanship. Then, they start bringing out the rickety worm wood to re-build the bridge.

IF REPUBLICANS WOULD LIVE UP TO CONSERVATISM THEY WOULDN'T NEED BRIDGES.

[Servant of the Cross]

Let’s recap shall we?: Rock ribbed conservatives Mark Levin and Sarah Palin (“anyone but Obama … we have got to replace Barack Obama and his socialist policies in November”) are on board with the Romney/Ryan ticket.