To the contrary G W Bush was hopelessly naive, and failed to attack democrats constantly.
G W Bush was the last person in history we want Mitt Romney to learn anything from.
Except (maybe) defending another nation.
Maybe that. Maybe. Bush had many great qualities but he also had several infuriating failures - his failure to go on the political attack when needed (over and over again) was a big no-no.
IMHO.
The idea is to win. G.W. Bush won reelection. He did not waste resources on Kerry until people were paying attention.
G W Bush was the last person in history we want Mitt Romney to learn anything from.
You're exactly correct! GW Bush was a blithering idiot when it came to going on offense against the demoRATs. In fact the only people or groups that he bristled at were conservatives who resisted him for his attempts at amnesty or his stealth SCOTUS appointees (including John Roberts).
GW Bush was best buddies with Ted Kennedy, who wrote No Child Left Behind and the trillion dollar Prescription Drug Plan, which then the demoRATs attacked GW Bush on. Too bad that New Gingrich failed to win the nomination. I believe that with all of Newt's flaws (many of which are made up by the liberal media) that he would have been the best, most articulate candidate against 0dumb0. And Newt would have been pounding the sh_t out of 0dumb0, like his worst enemy. Which BTW, 0dumb0 is the worst enemy of any American patriot or conservative.
I am waiting, along with other conservatives & patriots, to see if Mitt has the gonads & cajones to pummel 0dumb0 on dozens of travesties that 0dumb0 is guilty of.
Come on Mitt, grow a pair of balls and go on offense. Act like a man!