Posted on 08/08/2012 4:56:29 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Obama: Mitt Romney wants to take women back to policies of the '50s By Amie Parnes - 08/08/12 04:46 PM ET
President Obama on Wednesday accused Republicans of wanting to take the nation “back to policies more suited to the 1950s than the 21st century” during a campaign stop aimed at securing support from women.
Stumping on a two-day, four-stop swing through Colorado — a state where Obama needs strong turnout from women in November — the president sought to hammer home the benefits his healthcare law includes for families, such as free mammograms and contraception and cancer screenings with no copay.
But the president also emphasized the differences between him and his opponent, Republican presumptive presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who he said would take the Affordable Care Act and “kill it dead” on his first day in office.
“The decisions that affect a woman’s health aren’t up to politicians or insurance companies, they’re up to you,” Obama said during a fiery speech before a crowd of nearly all women.
Targeting Romney specifically, Obama said, “He said he’d ‘get rid of’ Planned Parenthood,” as the crowd booed.
“He joined the far right to support a bill that would allow an employer to deny contraceptive coverage to their employees,” Obama added. “Let me tell you something, Denver — I don’t think your boss should control the care you get. I think there is one person who should make decisions on your healthcare, and that person is you,” the president said.
Obama was introduced to the Denver crowd by Sandra Fluke, the recent law school graduate who wound up at the center of controversy earlier this year after she was targeted by Rush Limbaugh for publicly supporting the administration's contraception coverage mandate.
In brief remarks, Fluke credited Obama, who she said “defended my right to speak without being attacked.
“Mr. Romney could only say those weren’t the words he would have chosen," she said. "Well, Mr. Romney, you’re not going to be the candidate we choose." Fluke also chastised Romney, adding, “we know he’ll never stand up for us and he won’t defend the rights that generations of women have fought for.”
Meanwhile, a new Quinnipiac University/CBS/New York Times poll shows the president trailing Romney 50 to 45 percent in Colorado, a state he won with a 9-point margin in 2008.
Even before the president landed in Colorado to deliver his first speech of the two-day tour, Republican National Committee Co-Chairwoman Sharon Day accused him of “pandering to women today, hoping to distract from the devastating effects Obama policies have had on female voters."
“Today, unemployment among women is higher than when President Obama took office," Day said. "More women are out of work in the Obama economy, and the few jobs that are created go disproportionately to men. Women who manage the household budget are forced to make do with less as grocery store prices rise and wages fall. Mothers are terrified as they see their children’s future mortgaged by reckless government spending.”
Amanda Henneberg, a spokeswoman for the Romney campaign, also weighed in, saying that Obama's "four years in office haven't been kind to women.
"Hundreds of thousands of women have lost their jobs, poverty among women is highest in nearly two decades, and half of recent graduates can't find a job," Henneberg said. "Middle-class families have struggled in the Obama economy and Mitt Romney has a plan to strengthen the middle class and get our country back on the right track."
During his speech, Obama said Romney would take the country backward on women’s issues.
“Let me tell you — there’s nothing conservative about a government that prevents a woman from making her own health decisions,” he said. “Freedom is the chance to determine the care you need, when you need it.”
But the president didn’t just focus on women’s health issues. He also reminded the crowd that he was the one who tapped Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court.
“The next president could tip the balance of the court in a way that turns back the clock for women and families for decades to come,” he said.
He also mocked Romney for not coming forward with a firm answer on equal-pay issues.
“When my opponent’s campaign was asked if he’d fight to guarantee equal pay for equal work, they said ‘we’ll get back to you on that,’” he said.
1950’s policies are the only reason that Barack Hussein Obama survived to be born (1961). I’d hesitate to say 1950’s “values” because Stanley was way ahead of the curve into the 70’s on values. But 1950’s policies held her back from the 1970’s policies that would have sent her”mistake” (Obama’s values/ concept, not mine) swirling down the stream of a D&C. Talk about biting the hand that fed you.
I remember the late 50’s and early 60’s as a time when people were generally quite happy. Now, people in general, do not seem nearly as happy on the whole. Back then, America worked.
Women are more fortunate than men in these times. Shelters have a bias towards helping women, government programs have a bias towards helping women, retails jobs have a bias towards hiring women, gaps in employment are less a barrier for job-seeking women, women can find sublets and rooms for rent more easily, men have a bias towards helping women.
It's a crystal clear indication we don't have equality and this is the kind of inequality feminists and progressive like.
Gee, the dems are getting wimpy.
They should be saying, “Romney wants to kill women.”
That’s their SOP.
My thoughts exactly.
Women were happier and financially stronger in the 50s than now...
True that. I found in the family archives the bill from the hospital where I was born in 1955. My mom stayed 3 days, I was in some kind of special care (breathing difficulties, if I recall what my mom told me), and the sum total of the bill was less than $200.00, paid in full by my father!
Granted, $200 went a lot farther 57 years ago than today, but still!
wayback bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.