Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Doesn’t Medi-Share lose either way? If it successfully argues that it ISN’T insurance it is superseded by the ObamaCare insurance mandate. Medi-Share participants would have to buy medical insurance in addition to Medi-Share.


35 posted on 08/08/2012 12:53:53 AM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Drago

I was once in a similar program, not Medi-
share.

Here’s the thing: Obamacare would decimate such plans no matter whether the plan argued it was insurance or argued it wasn’t.

Because there’s more than just a requirement to buy insurance. The feds actually rule the details of every move everybody makes, from the insurance company plans to the lowliest individual consumer.

Every move has to be pre-approved by the HHS. What is covered, how much to charge, etc. These type plans follow their own internal rules. Those who sign on to them are voluntarily agreeing with those rules. And can voluntarily leave if they later decide to.

None of that is possibe under Obamacare.

WHAT to call it...insurance or not insurance, won’t matter.


38 posted on 08/08/2012 6:15:00 AM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson