[circlecity]

"With that, the White House is arguing that as long as the indefinite detention law hasn’t be enforced yet, there is no reason for a judge to invalidate it. "

WTF??? You don't wait until it's raining to fix the hole in the roof.

[RC2]

Americans should not fall under this law. If they enforce this on Americans, it violates the Constitution.

[Hayride]

I remember BOzo saying he signed NDAA but was “uncomfortable with some of the language in the bill.” Of course the MSM went along with that narative even though they knew the opposite was true. If you haven’t seen it yet, Youtube “Senator Carl Levin regarding NDAA 2012”. They might try to scrub the net of all evidence of that one day so hopefully some people are storing proof of such things.

[pierrem15]

The admin happens to be right: you can't ask a judge to adjudicate a case that hasn't occurred.

It's called "ripeness."

I find the whole notion as stated that the Fed gov is now "enjoined" from arresting people as specified in the act ludicrous: if the gov has armed men willing to obey, the judiciary can do nothing.

The real issue which absolutely no one will talk about is why do we have allow entry into our country of all kinds of terrorist supporters, and why can't the gov even discuss Islamic terrorism?