Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard
I believe that many other people had to have had suspicions about Sandusky, not just at The Second Mile (which requires a thorough investigation), but at Penn State and in the greater Penn State community.

But let's go to the 1998 investigation. You're aware, I assume, that two psychologists interviewed Sandusky as part of the investigation and that the Penn State psychologist stated in his report that Sandusky had the tendencies of a pedophile?

You also aware, I assume, that the Penn State police didn't turn that psychological report over to child welfare worker on the case, so that she made her recommendation not to prosecute based on the other report, which didn't find tendencies of a pedophile, and that the child worker has since stated that she would never have recommended dropping the case had she seen the damning report?

You're also aware, I assume, that there was no genital contact with that victim in 1998? Can you imagine trying to convict the acting defensive coordinator of PSU football (22+ years tenure) and long-time assistant coach (33+ years tenure) in Happy Valley because he showered with a boy? When at least two other PSU coaches were willing to testify at Sandusky's trial that showering with kids was normal?

Sometimes you don't prosecute cases because you know you can't win them.

You're alway aware, I assume, that Centre County DA Ray Gricar's nephew says that Gricar always had a sour taste in him mouth for PSU after the 1998 Sandusky case, because he felt that PSU and PSU football had stonewalled the investigation?

1998 wasn't simple.

100 posted on 08/07/2012 12:59:31 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster
Thanks for your kind post. It's a good post and I agree with your sentiments completely.

1998 wasn't simple.

No, it wasn't. Not at all. The 2002 incident that was kinda sorta witnessed by the cowardly 28-year-old assistant, McQueary (who then couldn't keep his own story straight), was not at all simple, either. I maintain that when it comes to accusing somebody of being a homosexual pedophile, you better see it with your own two eyeballs or AT LEAST have a victim come forward to point the finger. That never happened, and McQueary was totally unreliable.

None of this was simple, and that's why I have no respect for those morons who smugly claim Paterno is rotting in hell, as if he KNEW Sandusky was raping young boys. Paterno KNEW no such thing. Sandusky fooled literally hundreds of people, including Paterno. That's what homosexual pedophiles do - - they fool people.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, hindsight is 20/20. Paterno said that in hindsight he wished he had done more, and I believe him. I wonder how many scores of other people who associated on a regular basis with Sandusky right up until last freaking year wished they had, in hindsight, done more? I will never believe, as the smug simpletons around here with their 20/20 hindsight pretend to believe, that Paterno KNEW Sandusky was raping young boys and decided to just let it go on for the good of the football program. Gimme a break.

FRegards,
LH

106 posted on 08/07/2012 3:00:05 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson