O good Lord, the stupidity is thick tonight...
I guess you are voting indirectly for Ocrappy? I dislike Romney, but the choice is between Romney and ZERO. The others are there to help O win.
I don’t agree...but I mercifully decline to beat that dead horse any more.
O good Lord, the stupidity is thick tonight...
There is no use in trying to convince anyone of the ABR group in here to vote for Romney. They would rather see America turned into a communist third world $hithole before they would vote against their “principles” (regardless of the consequences to those “principles” in a second Obama term).
Forest for the trees so to speak....
Get your facts right - the GOP assures you of a zero win and fear DEMANDS you to bow. YOU have no other course but to eat the $*^T they give you because you are a fearful wuss!
I HATE EVIL and will NEVER bow. As you see we are miles apart as your train leads to the homo and pro abortion pit for eternity.
Absolutely false, mathematically a fallacy. The electoral college notwithstanding, there is only ONE WAY to vote for Obama, and that is to mark his name on the ballot. There is only ONE WAY to vote for Romney, and that is to mark his name on the ballot. There is only ONE WAY to vote for government tyranny, and that is to mark the name of a statist on the ballot -- Obama and Romney are both statists.
A third party vote favors neither Obama nor Romney, but it does NECESSARILY reduce the popular vote count of whichever guy wins, thus it contributes to a plurality. The last time a liberal was elected president on a plurality, he was impeached. The time before that a liberal was elected president on a plurality, he was forced to move right by the Republican Revolution.
The idea that not voting for Romney is "indirectly voting for Ocrappy" is a total emotional fallacy. And the idea of voting "against" Obama is as imaginary as voting for pretty pink unicorns. You can only vote FOR something. There is no voting "against." Even on proposition, you either vote FOR passing it, or you vote FOR nixing it.
There is no "voting against." I'll be voting FOR a plurality.