Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry

I suggest you hike up those big girl panties and start doing a little research on your own. The fact you haven’t already tells me how likely it is that you will. That would take courage.

You go right on ahead and take the easy way out there little lady.

My republican governor just announced another $38 million plus matching funds for greenways and preserves. Well actually about $5 for the land and the other $70 million or so is going to the cities for livable communities crap.


14 posted on 08/05/2012 8:02:30 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

“greenways and preserves” are NOT the same as the Suburban deterrents described in this article.

I live in a Denver suburb, complete with “greenways and preserves”, which happen to be a great way to provide open trails and enhanced mountain views.

There’s a difference between managing housing density and prohibiting growth.

The simple fact is that you’ve made an unsubstantiated claim, unsupportable by the facts, so you hide your fraud behind insults.


26 posted on 08/05/2012 8:46:22 AM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson