Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FL2012

I don’t think the Jenna Jamieson “endorsement” was serious, but in any event for some on here to attack Romney because some random person said they will vote for him really shows you to be ridiculous.


11 posted on 08/04/2012 7:45:31 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
Of Endorsements, Porn Stars, and Politico's Left-wing Agenda

Because the corrupt Politico has the exact same agenda as Jameson, to win Obama a second term, the corrupt Politico reported this endorsement without irony or comment.

What Politico forgot, though, is the long memory of the Internet. Yesterday, a tipster jumped in the wayback machine and found that in 2008 this very same Politico bent over backwards to protect Hillary Clinton from the very Jenna Jameson's endorsement:

Campaign ‘Undorsers': Boosters or Saboteurs?

With more than a year before the 2008 elections, we already know how O.J. Simpson, Jenna Jameson and Heidi Fleiss will vote, proving that political opinions are like local Emmys — everybody has one and they don’t matter much.

The online magazine Radar has dubbed these “the undorsements.”

They are “unsolicited proclamations of support” readily offered up by second-or-third-tier celebrities who, for obvious reasons, are more than happy to enter the fray of Oprahs and O’Reillys.

And by Radar’s count, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) leads the ’08 contenders in racking up undorsements. Some of her undorsers — Simpson, Jameson, Fleiss and “D.C. Madam” Deborah Jeane Palfrey — have had their share of legal and moral challenges.

53 posted on 08/04/2012 10:24:22 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson