Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

You’re from the same ilk as Mountain Mary, but sorry for the mistake.

You have the right to your opinion, but if you’re going to attack the one that will be the only chance to get O out of the WH, I do challenge your reasoning.

Go ahead and vote for Virgil, or write in Sarah.

By the way, Newt, Santorum, Perry, Bachman, Cain, Palin, Limbaugh, and many other conservatives have said they will support Romney. I do have the references for each of these if you would like, but I think you can trust my judgment.
:-) That being said, which one of the above conservatives did you back? Do you still back them?


23 posted on 08/03/2012 4:10:34 PM PDT by Justice4awe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Justice4awe
You’re from the same ilk as Mountain Mary

... and, similarly, you're from "the same ilk" as the pro-gay, pro-abortion, anti-gun Big Gub'mint liberal from Massachusetts. See how that works, winky...?

Newt, Santorum, Perry, Bachman, Cain, Palin, Limbaugh, and many other conservatives have said they will support Romney.

Argumentum ad populum is the error of schoolboys. Extraordinarily slow schoolboys, in particular. No Sale.

That being said, which one of the above conservatives did you back? Do you still back them?

Search function works just as readily for you as it does for me. If you're that genuinely interested: do your own homework.

*PLONK*.

29 posted on 08/03/2012 4:18:34 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Justice4awe; WarEagle; Jim Robinson
Is JimRob of "the same ilk" as the typical DUer as well, n00b...?

Do tell. Enthrall us.


37 posted on 08/03/2012 4:23:10 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Justice4awe; Mountain Mary; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; xzins; wagglebee
You’re from the same ilk as Mountain Mary

Bye Bye Noob.

I guess you can find your "ilk" elsewhere.

77 posted on 08/03/2012 5:17:42 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Justice4awe
Go ahead and vote for Virgil, or write in Sarah.

I know I will. I can't vote for a cowardly fag with no moral character. So tweedle mitt and tweedle obie are out of the question.

The libs and the log cabin types can have mitt all to themselves.

168 posted on 08/04/2012 5:57:55 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Justice4awe

You know, maybe us conservatives will vote for Romney to stop Obama, but there’s no way in hell that we have to like it. We aren’t your GOP vote-slaves, and it’s an insult you to act like we should just smile, shut up, and be happy that a homo-loving, abortion-pushing Massachusetts liberal has been shoved down our throats.


175 posted on 08/04/2012 7:55:20 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Justice4awe; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Mountain Mary; All
Let me get this straight, Justy. You're planning on voting for a guy with a solid record of advancing:

-- the entire homosexual agenda
-- state-run health care (Romney was the real author of ObamaCare)
-- the global warming agenda, even to the point of saying publicly that "we need a worldwide solution, not an American one," in terms of a carbon plan (listen to his CPAC speech of '08)
-- tax-funded on-demand abortion
-- the appointment of activist liberal judges

Romney's record CONFIRMS that he has done all these things. ROMNEY is the guy who belongs at DU.

Rush, Palin, Levin, and all the other pundits don't and never have instructed my opinion; the only reason they have ever had my ear is because the have CONFIRMED my opinion. You can let them tell you how to vote if you want; I'll vote the way my common sense tells me to vote, and my common sense says: the LAST time a president -- and he was a bad one -- was elected on a plurality, he was impeached; the time before that a president -- and he was a bad one --was elected on a plurality, he was held in check and even made to move right by the Republican Revolution.

No matter who wins this time around, Obama or Romney, we're going to have a very bad president. I'M VOTING FOR A PLURALITY. I'm voting third party.

And you can take your "DU" crap, sit on it, and rotate. Tend to the beam in your own eye, of voting for a stone-cold liberal, before you point to the splinters in our eyes, of voting such to risk an Obama re-election.

180 posted on 08/04/2012 10:18:43 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson