To: SoFloFreeper; P-Marlowe; wagglebee
As the article itself says, it is a free speech issue. Surely Mitt could have come down in favor of free speech. That seems fairly safe.
163 posted on
08/04/2012 5:26:41 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
To: xzins
Surely Mitt could have come down in favor of free speech.And him being a true "conservative" and all, no less. ;)
165 posted on
08/04/2012 5:35:44 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: xzins
As the article itself says, it is a free speech issue. Surely Mitt could have come down in favor of free speech. That seems fairly safe.
170 posted on
08/04/2012 6:54:41 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson