Other than that, yeah, I know what you're saying. But the way I see it is this: Thug #1 is tighrtening his grip on my throat. Thug #2 --- possibly a member of the same gang --- bursts through the door with some grievance against Thug #1. I'm thinking, "Yes! Thug #2! Hit 'im!"
Not because I trust the newcomer. ("Put not thy trust in princes...") But because at this instant, it's the only possible thing that could get #1 off of me even for a moment, and give me one more breath.
And consider this: Romney will "sometimes" defer to Congress. Sometimes. Obama never will. Obama is the more reliably lawless one.
On the other hand.... hmm. Maybe the less-disastrous thing might be a supermajority GOP House and Senate, and Obama in the White House. Because a GOP majority will "sometimes" block the plans of a socialist Dem president. They won't block a socialist GOP president's agenda.
The "Which Thug Dilemma".
Yes, I meant UNquestionable, indeed.
My internet connection was very poor at the time, so I missed that mistake. I hope it was clear in context.