You are correct --- but, not to quibble over mere wording --- it might be a matter of "bearing (a dubious) witness" in favor of your neighbor. They (the ambassadors) are, in a calculated bet, taking Romney at his word.
It may well be that Romney is lying, but (my comment above) even if he is, he's measurably less dangerous than Obama at this point. WHOEVER gets in, we'll have to tie them up with a non-veto-able, non-RINO House and Senate.
And between the two of them --- it IS between the two of them-- I'll vote for Romney just to be able to throw a punch at the Obamanation. It's as simple as that.
I can appreciate your view, Mrs. D, but let’s face a fact: what’s the over-under that in addition to a Willard win, the House stays Republican and the Senate gets won?
I remain unconvinced that Bishop Willard will remain true to the statements he’s made on his endless campaign road-show, which is now six years old and counting. I look at his actual deeds while in the State House and the Governor’s mansion.
For “by their deeds shall you know them”...
AMEN
If I could tell the future I would be rich. We can extrapolate Obama’s acts, but we don’t actually have full information on what Romney will do. It’s nothing more than a guessing game.
Obama is a known pro-abortionist, among other things. I will never forget his “punished with a child” remark. It was the remark of an evil mind.
Some FReepers will stoop to every level to avoid voting for Romney; but he’s the only choice offered against Obama in this nation. God knows how we vote. I will vote for the only viable alternative to Obama .... Romney.