Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LongWayHome

I think the difference is that it is fine to want to help people because you enjoy it or to serve your Lord. It is important to remember that you are not REQUIRED to. It is not your social DUTY. You would not be a bad person if you chose not to help. You should certainly never be physically forced into providing for others. Your virtue (altruism) should never be used as a weapon against you by the leeches and moochers in society. When we as a society start turning virtue (charity) into weakness and vice (covetousness) into a strength then people turn away from virtue and toward vice.


64 posted on 07/30/2012 9:13:47 AM PDT by nitzy ( Conservation is the policy of stewardship. Environmentalism is the religion of pagans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: nitzy

Great points by Nitzy & Lou L. My issues with Objectivism are several, but the main problem I see is that the Randians look at altruism as a force that has been imposed on humanity from outside. And if some Randian Superman comes along & breaks this spell all will be well. My point is that altruism, or the virtues & vices that make up altruism are part of human nature....and need to be grappled with as best we can. We are never going to get change what we are.


69 posted on 07/30/2012 10:05:32 AM PDT by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson