Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster
...nothing in the second amendment ( or the first for that matter) that is absolutist.

First: "Congress shall make no law..."

Second: "...shall not be infringed."

Sounds pretty absolute to me. I guess the only way they could have made their point stronger would be to prescribe summary hanging for anyone violating these rights.

Maybe we should do that next time...

"The People have the right to obtain and carry weapons and ammunition. Anyone who hinders the exercise of that right, physically, or by regulation, or by taxation shall upon detection be hanged by the neck until dead from the nearest available horizontal structure."

65 posted on 07/29/2012 8:01:45 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (Romney Sucks. Mutiny Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: ExGeeEye
hanged by the neck until dead from the nearest available horizontal structure."

All I have is a curb. This may take a while. ;)

/johnny

66 posted on 07/29/2012 8:09:30 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye

You quote the word CONGRESS that does not mean that the states are necessarily prescribed. You cannot openly engage in supporting the over throw of the US government without being charged with treason....You cannot shout fire in a crowded theater. You cannot print the shipping schedules of ships during times of war.....There are plenty of examples of non-absolutist instances.


78 posted on 07/29/2012 9:49:31 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson