The 14 Amendment changed all that. Now the Amendments are binding on the several states.
“The 14 Amendment changed all that. Now the Amendments are binding on the several states.”
I have read the 14th ammedment and it says absoulty nonthing of the first 10 amedments to the United States Constitution nor nor the 9 which were actually incorperated.
The incorperation doctrin is a competely arbtary & made up imposition of the Federal Corts. It has no basis in the text of the 14th ammedment nor any other part of the Federal Constitution.
Indeed it was in fact rejected by the first such Federal court to review the issue. A cort composed of people most knowledgeable about the subject amazement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cruikshank
It would not be for anther 50 years in 1925 that the Federal court would actually suddenly and miraculously “discover” the incorporation doctrine and then only selectively:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitlow_v._New_York
There is a name for that kind of discovery, lawlessness.
“The 14 Amendment changed all that. Now the Amendments are binding on the several states.”
I have read the 14th ammedment and it says absoulty nonthing of the first 10 amedments to the United States Constitution nor nor the parts of the 9 which were actually incorperated.
The incorperation doctrin is a competely arbtary & made up imposition of the Federal Corts. It has no basis in the text of the 14th ammedment nor any other part of the Federal Constitution.
Indeed it was in fact rejected by the first such Federal court to review the issue. A cort composed of people most knowledgeable about the subject amazement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cruikshank
It would not be for anther 50 years in 1925 that the Federal court would actually suddenly and miraculously “discover” the incorporation doctrine and then only selectively:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitlow_v._New_York
There is a name for that kind of discovery, lawlessness.