Posted on 07/29/2012 3:21:27 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
When you use rhetoric like “your boy Willie” after me posting that I vehemently disagree with Romney on a majority of issues and only consider that “possibly” he can be dealt with when I know “definitely” that Obama can’t, then I know there’s not going to be a serious discussion, so I will bow out.
Henry Blodget is such a reliable reporter... (/SARC).
PROFESSOR: Sarah Palin Probably Staged A Gigantic Hoax About Being Trig’s Mother by Henry lodget
http://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-baby-hoax-2011-4
And I respect it’s your choice to make.
Just to be crystal and factually clear: You send money to a Tea party candidate supported by the woman Romney’s crew had done all they can to destroy - Palin and the TEA party alike - And intend to empower the man responsible for it by voting him into power - while hoping the Tea Party can rally and overcome the liberalism in the GOP.
All of the above is 100% factually correct. Do you see a problem with this ‘logic’?
That poster has a strnage hatred of Mormons .
Odd
This isn’t about the past, this is about the Romneys being Mormon royalty and powerful religious leaders in a racist religion.
Mitt Romney was a religious leader teaching that stuff, spreading it around the world, he did not quit them, they merely sent down new orders one day, Romney never took a stand against them or changed his mind, he merely followed orders with no personal action whatsoever in one direction or the other.
While we were watching the movie Star Wars, Mitt Romney was teaching racism.
Which poster?
Regan one of our nations greatest presidents lobbied congress to ban assault weapons.
You must really consider him in the same vein as Mitt.
in 1994, Reagan directly lobbied Members of Congress to pass the federal Assault Weapons Ban. The ban passed the U.S. House of Representatives 216-214, a margin of just two votes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1153552/posts
I would also note that one could argue that McCain is more conservative than both Bushs. Neither Bush had a congressional record to compare to McCain so in reality a fair comparison is not possible.
Did you pull the lever for Bush-Cheney? Did you see how that "crew" is bashing her too in the form of Cheney saying the Palin pick was a mistake? So what is your solution, hide in a cave?
Show me where Bush and co bashed Palin prior to my votes for them. What they did after is out of my control.
So what part of my posts above was incorrect BTW?
Other than ‘fear’ there is no way to explain a vote for Romney outside of agreement with his history. And ‘fear’ is the stupidest reason ever invented to put someone unqualified into power. Or have we so quickly forgotten?
So does Mitt’s liberalism qualify him? Is that what we are FOR ? If so, then vote for him. But do NOT come back post vote and claim to be a conservative (since anyone claiming conservatives vote for liberals is insane), nor bitch when he rams down his liberal BS. It will be entirely the fault of the GOP and the ABO crowd. Not mine.
Here, how about this?
Mitt Romney wins much coveted Jimmy Carter endorsement
Gore Praises Romney's 'Climate Protection Plan'
Carville(D):
"It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing.
Romney is an ascendant guy."
Sen. John Kerry (D) to Don Imus on RomneyCARE:
"I like this health care bill".
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) on RomneyCARE:
"To come up with a bipartisan plan in this polarized environment is commendable."
George Soros Wants Mitt Romney
I don’t know that Romney is anti-black, but he is more susceptible to the charge than any other republican running this year. If you don’t understand this, you don’t know anything about Romney’s background. The democrats are keeping that silver cannon round (way bigger than a silver bullet) under wraps until either Romney is the nominee and can’t be replaced or if Obama begins doing so poorly, they imagine blacks might start to consider voting for Romney.
The only way Mitt will be able to defend himself is by leaving the Mormon religion. He won’t do that and the dems won’t let him off the hook. So, if you think they can’t cry race on him, get ready, steel yourself.
He will if he thinks it will help him win this election. He will do or say anything to win.
Blodget and mitt have a lot in common.
LLS
LLS
Define liberty however you want. I define it as not being in a position of having my government tell me what I can or cannot do or think.
_____________________________________
So as Ansel said “that is one vote for the pro-abortion platform.”
“FUMR!!”
Square in the arse!
LLS
“The ban passed the U.S. House of Representatives 216-214, a margin of just two votes. One of those votes was cast by former Rep.
Dick Swett (D-NH), who credited Reagans direct involvement for his aye vote. Swett told the Boston Globe, he made up his mind after being lobbied by the idol of GOP conservatives, President Ronald Reagan.
You are correct about the vote tally, but slightly off the mark. I was home from work due to an injury and watched the vote on C-Span. The bill initially failed and voting was held open by Tom Foley until some arms could be twisted to change votes to “aye.” In fact a local TV station (Bay Area) reported on a live broadcast that the bill had failed. I doubt that Swett was one of the vote switchers if he had made his mind up after being lobbied by Reagan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.