To: mkjessup
You sad? I thought you were sad. I thought that I made you sad. Sarah makes you sad.
To: 1rudeboy
You sad? I thought you were sad. I thought that I made you sad. Sarah makes you sad.
Your comprehension skills need some repair, the day has not dawned nor will it dawn, that you (or Sarah for that matter) can make me "sad", the fact is I have said many times that Sarah has energized the Tea Party movement, has motivated conservatives to fight the GOP-e, and in fact I've suggested more than a few times that if a brokered convention could be achieved, she just might be able to pull off a miracle and become the nominee. The odds of that? Pretty damn steep.
Unfortunately for the most radical and extreme Sarah supporters, it is verboten to utter one word of even the slightest doubt concerning her actions and words (example: do the names Dan Liljenquist, Chuck DeVore, J.D. Hayworth ring a bell? They are conservatives that Sarah declined to support in favor of their total-RINO opponents, but to mention that causes many of her fans to bare their fangs, foam at the mouth and spew venom most bile). Now in this thread, because Dick Cheney expressed doubt about her selection as McLame's running mate, he is now being vilified and condemned in every sort of despicable slur, but where were these pure conservative souls when Sarah herself was making common cause with RINOs like Orrin Hatch, John McCain in his re-election bid in Arizona, etc.? Oh she could do no wrong, because it had become all about PERSONALITY, not about conservative principles.
Sorry if this post makes anyone "sad".
163 posted on
07/29/2012 9:22:31 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson