To: Sir Napsalot
If you are storing runoff upstream, that means that a property owner down stream is not getting water, or not getting enough. I don’t see this law as unreasonable, since it is an attempt to balance the needs of all property owners within the watershed area. Nothing promotes animosity among neighboring landowners like a fight over water.
23 posted on
07/27/2012 8:09:06 AM PDT by
HerrBlucher
("The cross opens its arms to the four winds; it is a signpost for free travelers." GK Chesterton)
To: HerrBlucher
If you are storing runoff upstream, that means that a property owner down stream is not getting water, or not getting enough. I don’t see this law as unreasonable, since it is an attempt to balance the needs of all property owners within the watershed area. Nothing promotes animosity among neighboring landowners like a fight over water.There is always another side of the story and you just pointed this out.
That is the problem with these blog post you only hear one side of the story...and as Rush always say's it's not what they tell you but what they DON'T tell you that is more important.
32 posted on
07/27/2012 8:18:03 AM PDT by
trailhkr1
(Bigamy: Having at least one wife too many. Monogamy: Definitely having one wife too many.)
To: HerrBlucher
OK. The point is well taken.
But sentenced to 30 days in jail for collecting rain water is justified?
35 posted on
07/27/2012 8:20:56 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: HerrBlucher
Other neighbors don’t have an inherent right to water that falls on your property.
43 posted on
07/27/2012 8:31:42 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson