Then why is it, that many leave out the beginning sentences?
“.....look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own.
I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. (Applause.)
If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges.
If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.
The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”
Hannity just played this EXACTLY!!! Good for you Sean.
It's not JUST:
“If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.”
It's:
1. “look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own.”
2. “You didn’t get there on your own.”
3. “If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.”
4. “Somebody else made that happen.”
All four are complete sentences ending with a period. For you nitpickers, in the first broken sentence, Obama changed thoughts mid stream and this new thought starts with the word “look”.
Transcript from:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia
Thanks for the hotlink.
I found this gem that seems to sum up the creepy, commie Kenyan’s basis for building, (with the help of “somebody else” of course), COMMUNE AMERIKA:
” - - - We rise or fall together as one nation and as one people, and that’s the reason I’m running for President — because I still believe in that idea. You’re not on your own, we’re in this together.”
Just think of the “Changes!”
1.) No more risk when trying to build something new, as one would never be on one’s own, but always with everybody helping tirelessly.
2.) Patents would be meaningless since everybody will have done their “fair share,” (but no more than THEIR fair share), and thus according to The Fairness Doctrine, it would be unfair to reward any one person for effort above and beyond what was agreed to in the Union of Fairness inflexible Fairness Contract.
3.) The US Patent Office would abolished retroactively to the date of Obama’s Kenyan or Hawaiian Birth, whichever came first.