Yes, well Factcheck.org (no fan of Mittens) has chimed in on the matter as well....
"None of the SEC filings show that Romney was anything but a passive, absentee owner during that time, as both Romney and Bain have long said. It should not surprise anyone that Romney retained certain titles while he was working out the final disposition of his ownership, for example." ....
"We would reassess our judgment should somebody come up with evidence that Romney took part in specific management decisions or had any active role (not just a title) at Bain after he left to head the Olympics. But nothing we’ve seen directly contradicts Romney’s statements — which he has certified as true under pain of federal prosecution — that he “has not had any active role” with Bain or “been involved in the operations” of Bain since then."
http://factcheck.org/2012/07/romneys-bain-years-new-evidence-same-conclusion/
I could be wrong, EV, but throwing in with David Corn and Mother Jones just doesn't strike me as a sound career move for any pro-lifer.
I have no doubt that this man who spent his entire adult life actively pushing child murder, and whose default position to this day is in support of judicial supremacy and therefore abortion on demand, profited substantially from Stericycle’s gruesome trade.
What else does any person of conscience need to know?
And it has nothing to do with David Corn.
In the first place I have never "thrown in" with David Corn or Mother Jones. That's a gross misrepresentation on your part.
Secondly, I seriously doubt that "throwing in" with Mitt Romney is going to burnish the credentials of Republican "pro-lifers."
Should we assume that you’ve “thrown in” with “FactCheck”?