Arpaio press conference: Evidence of fraud. No refute from the Obama White House.

http://www.freerepublic.com ^ | 7/17/2012 | dragnet2

[dragnet2]

A Sheriff of a major county in the United States conducted a thorough and formal investigation regarding President Obama's birth record.

They provided substantial evidence today in a public news conference saying the birth record is fraudulent.

Yet not a word from the White House.

In fact in the news conference Sheriff Arpaio stated: "President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent", which they then provided detailed evidence.

How is it possible, with all the resources available to the White House, including an army of attorneys, advisers, researchers and spokespersons, not a single word refuting the evidence laid out today?

These are extremely serious allegations, backed up by evidence, broadcasted in an open public news conference today.

If the evidence Arpaio and his investigators provided were false, misleading or inaccurate, would it not be very easy for the White House with all their available resources, to deny or refute the evidence?

Why the silence?

Can we expect President Obama and his administration to publicly refute or disprove this evidence?

If not, why not?

[Ray76]

Plausible. Very plausible.

[tsowellfan]

I believe the GOP establishment wants this issue ignored because of Marco Rubio not having citizen parents. Their assumption seems to be that if they don't pursue the eligibility angle against Obama, the Dems won't dare use it against Rubio.

Good point!

[Casie]

I use Adobe Photoshop CS4. Its not even that big of a deal to be expert level in it. MY 13 year old niece uses this exact software expertly in an advanced photography program. It is very common for me to not flatten anything at all until a final has been approved. Even then, I include a copy of the original PDF to the customer in case they need to change text at some point down the road, ie a phone number. I still think it is more logical to believe the receiver of the image did not know about the existence of layers and ran with the image thinking it was simply as it appeared on his screen.

The most interesting thing will be seeing how this forgery will be viewed in the near future. Ten years ago I took Photoshop in college graphics design courses. But now students in middle school are skilled in these photo editing programs! When this technology becomes practically common knowledge, how silly will this phony birth certificate fiasco look?

[wita]

How is it possible, they could continue to simply ignore the evidence?

Now there is a question “we” have been trying to answer for as long as we have had the “problem”.

[wita]

“It isn’t old news that Hawaii has an illegal birth certificate factory going on , is it?”

Well, I’m thinking it is. When was Obama’s done?

Back in the sixties, and probably the “system” was going on LONG before that.

It must have been pretty common knowledge on the left.

After all, a certificate of live birth in a real state in the USA, probably means just what we observed in the case of B H O. Where there is paper there is your PROOF.

Proof of What exactly is the question.