Andy, a gun ban is a gun ban.
You can parse it and dance all you want, it’s still a gun ban.
And it banned semi-automatics.
It was a gun BAN, get it?
You said that I lied.
Where is the lie?
“which was the price extracted from him by an 85% Democrat legislature “
So Romney is a wuss who couldn’t govern Massachussetts, and you expect him to do any better in Washington?
What’s the definition of insanity again?
But you accused Romney of banning all guns in Massachusetts and that was an inaccurate statement - parse it any way you want - it is not a statement of fact.
As for what he had to do when confronted with a hostile legislature, stonewalling state attorneys and uncooperative police departments, that is another matter. I came from Massachusetts and clearly you know nothing about it. Up until January of last year, Republican members of the state House and Senate could meet in a diner. A very small diner. And other than them, there was not a single elected Republican official in the state.
But accusing Romney of being a "wuss" is name-calling, not argumentation. Obama can do that on his own.
Like the vast majority of Republicans, I will probably vote for Romney, and not because I like or trust him but because the alternative is the end of America at the hands of a Marxist alien, and I cannot live with that on my conscience.