[justiceseeker93]

You don't think that maybe their motivation was to get that information out to a wider audience, and not just preach to the choir here on FR?

I would agree with you on that - the wider the audience the better, generally speaking. I did acknowledge in my earlier post here (#142) that the Arpaio investigation, although not coming up with much astonishing when viewed in the light of previous investigations, gives findings the official imprimatur of a law enforcement agency, which is likely to influence some people who previously were unsure about the birth certificate issue.

[justiceseeker93]

Sorry I may have confused you. That earlier post # 142 was on a different thread, titled "Arpaio: Obama birth record 'definitely fraudulent.'"

[justiceseeker93]

Sorry I may have confused you. That earlier post # 142 was on a different thread, titled "Arpaio: Obama birth record 'definitely fraudulent.'"

[Fred Nerks]

Have you noticed the various comments that appear from time to time on FR about the public, when asked, do not recognize the names Frank Marshall Davis or Jerermiah Wright, for example? The public knows NOTHING. And that’s the way the perps NEED it to be.
Any little light shining on what’s going on has to be appreciated methinks.
(As long as the light-bearers remain hale, hearty and healthy...)
We live in interesting times.

[bgill]

I would agree with you on that - the wider the audience the better, generally speaking

One of the Austin, TX tv stations was supposed to have aired it but guess who just happened to be landing in Austin at the exact same time? Yet another in a very long, long string of coinky dinks.