So he’s come over here from the Dr Conspiracy site quoting a graphic that’s totally unconnected to the matter of the RACE OF PARENT.
Doesn’t surprise me.
But you fell for it?
Try this site:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html
“your link appears to refer to the RACE OF CHILD - not the RACE OF THE PARENT: “
That is correct. The birth certificate never listed the race of the child - that was determined by the coding of the parents. If both parents were one race the child was listed as that race in the US vital stats. If the parents were a different race than each other, the child was listed as the race of the father. With the exception that if one parent was “negro” and the other was a different race - the child would always be coded as negro. There was most defiantly a classification for “not stated” under race. And in 1962 NJ decided not to include any race identifiers on it’s birth reporting anymore. So every NJ birth was a “not stated”. Not - other non-white, or other, but specifically “not stated”.
I am aware that YOU know this - so this comment is for those that do not.
While I could not find the 1961 VS instruction manual online, I did find reference to it in a ‘62 Vital Stats summary.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/does-it-exist-the-1961-vital-stat-instruction-manual