Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone

So he’s come over here from the Dr Conspiracy site quoting a graphic that’s totally unconnected to the matter of the RACE OF PARENT.
Doesn’t surprise me.
But you fell for it?

Try this site:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html


849 posted on 07/18/2012 6:13:16 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

“your link appears to refer to the RACE OF CHILD - not the RACE OF THE PARENT: “

That is correct. The birth certificate never listed the race of the child - that was determined by the coding of the parents. If both parents were one race the child was listed as that race in the US vital stats. If the parents were a different race than each other, the child was listed as the race of the father. With the exception that if one parent was “negro” and the other was a different race - the child would always be coded as negro. There was most defiantly a classification for “not stated” under race. And in 1962 NJ decided not to include any race identifiers on it’s birth reporting anymore. So every NJ birth was a “not stated”. Not - other non-white, or other, but specifically “not stated”.

I am aware that YOU know this - so this comment is for those that do not.

While I could not find the 1961 VS instruction manual online, I did find reference to it in a ‘62 Vital Stats summary.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/does-it-exist-the-1961-vital-stat-instruction-manual

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/does-it-exist-the-1961-vital-stat-instruction-manual


870 posted on 07/19/2012 10:03:25 PM PDT by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 849 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson