Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

You forgot her uncle Charles T Payne, who was Deputy Director of the University of Chicago Library...he and his wife lived in Hyde Park, and he was at the university at least from 1960 until after zero was a lecturer at the same university...Mrs Payne was on a committee with the wife of David Axelrod.
Small world, Chicago is.

Major problem; there’s no physical evidence of SAD either pregnant, or with the kenyan or in Hawaii before we see images of her with a two or three year-old.

Chasing where SAD may have given birth is a dead end if she was the nanny and not the mother.


834 posted on 07/18/2012 4:49:21 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 813 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks
You forgot her uncle Charles T Payne, who was Deputy Director of the University of Chicago Library...he and his wife lived in Hyde Park, and he was at the university at least from 1960 until after zero was a lecturer at the same university...Mrs Payne was on a committee with the wife of David Axelrod. Small world, Chicago is.

Yes, you are right. I did forget about him. He is a sort of weak target on my radar, but now that you have mentioned him he is indeed a possibility. One of the benefits that might have been available for her in going to Chicago is a more easily obtained abortion. She probably could get one in Seattle or Vancouver, but in Chicago it would be a virtual certainty, especially given the connections Frank Davis would have had.

Much of these people's lives do seem to orbit Chicago, one way or the other.

Major problem; there’s no physical evidence of SAD either pregnant, or with the kenyan or in Hawaii before we see images of her with a two or three year-old.

Chasing where SAD may have given birth is a dead end if she was the nanny and not the mother.

Not so much a problem for me. My mother has no evidence that she was pregnant with any of us, other than birth certificates. Neither does any of my three sisters, nor for that matter does my wife. Apparently my family never thought it worthwhile to take photographs of any pregnant family members. As a result, I regard it as unremarkable that there are no pictures of Stanley Ann pregnant. Now we do have BIRTH pictures. (Pictures of us taken shortly after birth.) But we have no pregnancy pictures at all.

The notion that Barack is anyone's child but Stanley Ann's would have to have a great deal of supporting evidence in order for me to take a serious look at it. A lack of pregnancy or infant pictures is not sufficient to generate any suspicion on my part.

854 posted on 07/19/2012 1:42:54 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson