I thought the numbers indicated WHERE the document was coded. The person doing the coding at each location marked their batch number code on the document where information was not provided. This is why the code number 9 was concerning, since the Nordyke Twins were marked with #1s. Is this incorrect?
Yes, you are incorrect. The 9 means the space was left blank by the person filling out the form. There should not be any information in those spaces with a 9 and on Obama’s there is.
Apparently that is incorrect. The pencil marks were for census reasons. Not only did they not use the designation “African”, the “9” in pencil meant that the field was left blank. The info wasn’t provided. If it were provided, it would have been #2 because that was the designation for “Negro” or #7 for “Other Non-White”.
The document number, itself, actually provided the info of the location in numerical sequence. Because Zero’s BC number was numbered AFTER the Nordyke twins, yet he was both born before them, and his BC was also stamped and dated BEFORE the twins’ were, that indicated that his birth did not occur at the same hospital, as it would have been in sequence from the same hospital. His number was in the wrong sequence, ergo, he was not born there. He may have been born in Hawaii, but it wasn’t at that hospital, was the conclusion of the Posse.
We knew that info at FR, but it was explained to the press today, though they were clearly there to discredit it, not for any investigative journaling. And I am sure that it went over those mediots’ heads.
I wish they could locate baby Virginia’s BC. I am sure that the DOH and the hospital have that under lock and key, if they have not already destroyed it.