Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The result is that the Republican presidential candidate is left without the endorsement of a woman who can energise his base in a way he can only dream of.”

And if one votes for someone just because of an endorsement, I would question that person’s ability to think for themself.


64 posted on 07/16/2012 3:18:58 PM PDT by Bruinator ("For socialism is not merely the labour question, it is before all things an atheistic question")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bruinator

I wouldn’t vote for Romney just because Sarah Palin (or anyone else, for that matter) endorsed him. I will only vote for him because a second term for Barack Hussein Obama, unshackled and with nothing to lose, is unthinkable. I’m guessing that most Germans in 1946 wished that they could go back to the 1930’s and do things differently, don’t you? And in 2013, conservatives, Tea Partiers and the like will be the Jews in 1943.


69 posted on 07/16/2012 3:25:14 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Bruinator

Well Romney questions voters ability to think for themselves with all his groveling for support from other politicians - and some conservatives politicians believing they will sway them and it worked.


70 posted on 07/16/2012 3:29:05 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson