Your mind is an 8-track tape. Fine. I guess I have always been wrong in thinking there is a dilution effect by voting for third candidates and it is only 1+1=2+1=3, and so on. It can only be be so. I guess I was wrong and that Ross Perot had no impact in 1992 simply because people didn't vote for Bush 41. Bush didn't win because people didn't vote for him. But, if they had, he might have. But they didn't so he didn't. Wow, I never knew - and here most pollsters said that Perot voters were comprised mostly of traditional Republicans. Bush could not have used any of those 19 million Perot votes. Wow. It is all cleared up now.
Clinton 44,909,8806 votes
Bush 39,504,150
Perot 19,743,821
This is silly. Do with your vote as you will.
3+1=4+1=5+1=6... Don't bother writing back, I'm working on a math problem.
Holy mackerel! No wonder you're voting for Romney.
You're so confused twixt math and emotion and intent, that to oppose government tyranny, you're going to vote FOR a politician with an established record of advancing government tyranny.
You might want to step away from the calculator.