Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sunmars; All
She won't define "fair share;" what Democrat will?

They had their opportunity in 2010 when they still controlled the House and Senate and the rates were set to expire. Sorry, missy, but these are the Bush-Obama tax rates.

Their @#&% demagogic plan will do NOTHING to get people working again.

Getting people back to work will increase revenues far better than raising rates on some arbitrary 'class' of tax payer.

What's the matter with these damnable people?

73 posted on 07/16/2012 7:27:27 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey; David Isaac
She won't define "fair share;" what Democrat will?

That's because their staffers have already told them what the top 2% is paying. If they get pinned into quoting a number, they'll have to cite a "reasonable" one. And then someone will point out that threshold is already met.

Do you know what proportion of federal individual income taxes the top 2% actually pay? I'm not trying to make you look bad. I'm just trying to point out that few people actually know.

I didn't pick 2% arbitrarily. It's where singles with 200K AGI and married couples with 250K AGI fall on the scale, according to the IRS's own data.

And according to the IRS's data, the top 2% paid 45.35% of all federal individual income taxes in 2009. That's down from 48.68% in 2007.

(David, I pinged you on this response because I realized I misread the table in my last posting to you. I accidentally read off the numbers for the top 3% earlier.)

81 posted on 07/16/2012 8:25:50 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson