Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

That’s cost analysis done by us bean counters for pricing.

Overall labor costs are what drove GM to bankruptcy with fat union contracts paying people for life.


120 posted on 07/16/2012 3:13:35 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Democrats are dangerous and evil. Republicans are useless and useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Fledermaus
Ok read the whole thing. The labor figure INCLUDES current retiree benefits.. Look I can lead you to watrer but if you are to brainwashed to see what is in front of you eyes then you are acting like a "Donkey"


--------------------

In the US, it takes about 30 hours total, for the body, engine, transmission, assembly, paint, etc. doesn't include things like outsourced parts and mining the ore (or recycling old cars). the labor costs from $55-$70 per hour including benefits so about $2100 per car, or roughly 8% the cost of the average car. doesn't sound that high until you compare the tata nano, which costs $2500 total. Labor costs are higher at companies with older presences, because they tend to have more expensive health care, larger families, and because the pensions become more expensive over time. national healthcare and pensions would make doing business a lot easier. Ford and GM pay ~$70 and Toyota pays ~$55. Source unknown.

$70/hr sounds like a ton of money, but starting wage for laborers is only about $14/hr....barely enough to pay the bills in the US. The top earners make $29/hr. Health care and pensions cost equivalent of about $15/hr, vacation time, overtime, sick leave are the equivalent of roughly $10 per hour. Benefits for retirees are roughly $15/hr (this isn't really wages by most definitions but ends up in all the reports). Maybe its time for the US government to step up and provide reasonable healthcare for working and retired people who pay taxes all their lives? Source unknown.

The difference in *time to build a car* between manufacturers is small (10% difference from worst to best). So the difference in *cost to build a car* between Ford's and Toyota's labor cost per vehicle is $15/hr * 30 hours + $70/hr * 2hrs, or roughly $600 , or < 3% of total cost. Source unknown.

Another question to ask is how much does *overhead* cost to build a new car? How much in management, paper pushing, legal fees, etc. Also, instead of beating that old dead horse of the cost of labor (heard it since the 70's!), it might be interesting to know why some manufacturers have better looking, more fun to drive, more reliable vehicles. Making a better-organized dashboard is free....so who are the managers that think this is a bad idea? Who was the brains behind the Pontiac Aztec? Why does GM use cheap plastic instead of more sturdy stuff for $5 more? There are great designers, engineers, craftsmen, and businesspeople in the US. They just don't work in lofty places at the big 3! Source unknown.

The cost of a car or just about anything is the cost of labor. The labor to make the robots that assemble the cars, the labor to build the buildings. the labor for outsourced parts, and even the labor earnings that was invested to buy the land.

beer is an alcoholic drink and you might pee your pants but pooping would be better for your health and if you eat a burrito dont eat beans cause youll fart up a storm

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_does_labor_cost_to_build_a_new_car#ixzz20pJmsIGB

121 posted on 07/16/2012 3:21:17 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson